You might try turning discrete graphics off in LR and see if it might help? A discrete gpu is also supposed to help the most when working with very large raw files. It uses the gpu only in the library module and from what I've read it can actually cause a lag when moving the data to the gpu. The current version of LR makes little use of gpus. I know we all have different standards, but for most editing in LR it really doesn't feel that sluggish.Ī couple of other points. I'm no running the LR catalog and files off of an external ssd connected by ssd. The raw files with which I'm working are only about 24mb. It has integrated Intel graphics which are dated even by integrated Intel graphics standards. It's one of the good ones with a 2.6ghz quad core i7 and I upgraded to it to 16gb of ram.
MACBOOK PRO VEGA 20 ADD MEMORY MAC
I'm no expert here but I'm wondering just how slow it's really running and how large are the files you're working on? I'm still using a 2012 Mac mini.
MACBOOK PRO VEGA 20 ADD MEMORY FREE
Do you have at least 20% of free HD space if you store you files on the MacBook? Do you optimize your catalogue from time to time? (Especially for Lightroom, which, I believe, does not make extensive use of multiple cores.)Īnother thing you didn't tell us is version of Lightroom you are running: LR5? LR6? LR Classic CC? the new Lightroom CC? I don't know the version history, but some versions of Lightroom might be better than others at handling Retina displays and high-resolution external monitors.ĭefine what is slow.
![macbook pro vega 20 add memory macbook pro vega 20 add memory](https://icdn.digitaltrends.com/image/digitaltrends/vega20.jpg)
If you already have a 15" rMBP, yes, I would expect a six-core 2018 15" one to be better, but not so much better as to turn unacceptable performance into great performance. A 15" 2016 rMBP has four cores and a discrete GPU. A 13" 2016 rMBP has two cores and no discrete GPU. You did not say if you're coming from a 13" rMBP or a 15" one. This probably isn't your culprit, but it's easy to check and cross off the list. It's good for there to be at least 10% – when you fill a SSD to the very brim, write performance tends to drop. One thing you might want to check is the free space on your SSD. I think it would be worth trying to find out why it is slow on your current rMBP before making a decision on whether to buy a new one. If Lightroom is slow on a 2016 Retina MacBook Pro with 16 GB of RAM, it's not clear that it will run a whole lot faster on the latest hardware. Seems people are saying it seems "better" but what does that mean? If it is fixed (or will not be a big issue) then I would prefer having the latest model, both for performance, postponing next upgrade, and resale value, but if not, then I would happily get the i7 if the performance was close and it was a more reliable workhorse. I dont want to get the i9 if the heating issue is not truly resolved. The difference between the two is about $270, so I am not basing this on cost.
![macbook pro vega 20 add memory macbook pro vega 20 add memory](https://www.imore.com/sites/imore.com/files/styles/xlarge/public/field/image/2018/07/macbook-pro-2018-coffee-lake-hero.jpg)
So, I am looking to sell it and get either the latest i7 or i9 with the vega 20 (If I could afford a mac pro or imac pro I'd do that, bu not in the budget). in warm weather, the fans go off almost immediately and after 20 min, it can be intolerable.
I work with an external monitor and tried any number of things to speed it up to no avail. I'm on a 2016 Macbook Pro w/ 16G RAM and LR can be so slow as to be unusable at times, esp.